Destiny's case against Going-there

We are committed to a mission of excellence and integrity in the provision of professional services. We work to maintain these high standards every day.

It saddens us to say some do not share our principles and, rather than operate fairly in the marketplace, resorted to harmful and anti-competitive practices, as well as the spread of misleading FUD, an unethical yet common anti-competitive practice.

Key Facts

Our principal founder pursued a legal case against Going-there Global Destination Services aka GT Limited in the UK for contract violations and non-payment in 2022.

Destiny Services is not in violation of a services agreement with Going-there or any other client, past or present.

Destiny Services' principal founder has never been directly employed by Going-there, has never violated a non-compete agreement, and was not in violation of a non-compete agreement at the time of launch of our services. These facts were vetted by attorneys prior to launch and prior to claims made by Going-there's principal owner.

Going-there cited a non-compete clause it voided with non-payment and which lacked application under US law as a defense only after our principal founder pursued Going-there in the UK for non-payment of services rendered that, by all accounts, helped rescue Going-there financially during the global pandemic.

Going-there violated and voided its services agreement with our principal founder in 2021 when it failed to make payment for management consulting services rendered prior to the existence of Destiny Services.

These facts have been reviewed and vetted by attorneys both in the United States and the United Kingdom from October 2021 to the present day.

In investigating these claims, which have bearing upon the reputation of our company, we uncovered a pattern of wrongdoing at Going-there that includes repeated violations of consultant services agreements and failure to pay consultants and partners both during the course of ordinary business and following contract terminations. Our investigators, as well as a number of those working in the relocation industry, have alleged that this is simply typical of how Going-there does business.

We spent two years investigating Going-there in regard to these claims. During this time, our principal founder pursued a lawsuit against Going-there in the UK over the substantial debt they owed him. We have been aided in this process by US and UK lawyers, UK and EU collections investigators, former consultants and partners of Going-there, and, at times, even by Going-there's own managing contractors and personnel. In the simply put words of one highly respected, third-party collections investigator: Going-there's owner is highly unethical.

We have been advised that there is little point spending to advance lawsuits against Going-there in the UK, because its owner is unlikely to pay any legal judgments to us or to our principal founder, and they appear to have been drawing out our costs. Going-there is registered to a mail drop in London with no known assets and UK experts have advised us that they appear to be structured using well-known techniques to dodge legal judgments and liabilities. The company similarly has no tangible US presence, only contractors and consultants.

We have collected witness testimonies from parties involved in the case and from other alleged victims of Going-there. If you have additional information regarding these matters or have been similarly affected by Going-there, please contact us.